Abstract
Carrying out a close reading of Figura by Auerbach, this study points out some inconsistencies in the application of the concept of ‘figura’ to the Divine Comedy. In this perspective, it analyzes Auerbach’s later studies on Dante. On the basis of medieval and early modern rhetorical and theological treatises, the ‘figura’ has to be intended as equivalent to the allegoria in factis. Finally, this study considers the hermeneutical consequences of ‘figura’ (intended both according to Auerbach and literally) for the interpretation of characters in the Divine Comedy.